All articles

A day trade that follows the day's own tide

Some days a stock picks a direction in the morning and holds it. This strategy asks three questions to find those days and does nothing on the rest. In our test, doing nothing would have been better still.

Published 22 October 2026 by the AlgoVend team. About 3 minutes to read.

Not yet listed. Not yet listed. Over the test window the family lost after costs, and the quality bar needs a positive result over at least twenty trades.

Watch a large stock for enough mornings and you notice that days come in two kinds. On one kind the price wanders around the open and finishes near it. On the other it picks a direction by ten o'clock and spends the rest of the day going there. A strategy that could tell the kinds apart at ten would have most of a trend day to profit from and would simply sit out the rest.

This one tries. It asks three questions of a stock before buying, and if any answer is no, it waits.

The three questions

  • Has the stock turned up? A line called the Supertrend follows the price at a distance set by how much it normally moves, and sits above the price in a fall and below it in a rise. When the line flips from above to below, the stock has turned.
  • Are the buyers winning today? VWAP is the day's average price weighted by how much traded at each level. A price above it means more of today's business was done lower than here, which is to say buyers have had the upper hand since the open.
  • Is there a trend at all? The ADX is a score of how strongly a price is moving in one direction, regardless of which. Below a threshold, the flip was a wobble, not a turn.

Three yeses and it buys. It sells when the Supertrend flips back, which is its main exit, with a stop below and a target above to bound the trade in between, and everything is closed by a quarter past three.

What the test found

It lost. Not dramatically, and not because the idea is wrong about trend days, which it finds. It lost because the trades are small and the charges are not. An intraday trade in a large stock that goes well earns a fraction of a percent of the account. The brokerage and taxes on the way in and out take a meaningful slice of that, and on the trades that stop out they take the slice anyway. Over the window, about half of what the strategy lost was charges. The other half was the choppy days it could not tell apart from trend days until it was already in.

The idea finds trend days. The charges find every day. Over the test, the second was the larger effect.

What would have to change

Fewer trades or larger moves. The first is a stricter filter, a higher ADX bar that lets through fewer and better days, at the price of many days with nothing to do. The second means instruments that move more within a day than a large-cap share does. Either is a design change, and we would rather list nothing in this family than loosen a threshold until the test turns green, because a threshold tuned to the past is the most reliable way to produce a strategy that only ever worked there.

An earlier version of this strategy had a different problem, worth mentioning because it is the kind of thing a test catches. It treated 'the Supertrend is up' as the entry instead of 'the Supertrend has just flipped up', and so it bought again on every five-minute bar the trend held, paying brokerage on each. More than one order a bar across a dozen stocks. The rule now enters on the flip itself and nowhere else. The result still did not pass, but it fails for an honest reason now.

If you take one thing away

Supertrend and VWAP find the days a stock picks a direction and sit out the rest. In our test the trades were too small to beat their own charges, and the family stays unlisted until the design, not the threshold, changes.

Think a stricter filter or wider stop fixes supertrend and vwap trend? Open the rule sheet, change the numbers, and run your own test.

Customize Supertrend and VWAP trend